Historical fiction for young people…follows in the footsteps of the adult historical novel, the only difference being that it often chooses a hero of its readers’ age, who has a mentality and psychology close to those of our children and teenagers.
– Thaler, 2003, Understanding Children’s Literature
The belief in historical fact qua fact is if anything stronger [in children’s historical fiction than in children’s historical non-fiction] … Historical fiction for children acts as history improved, a superior replacement for the real but flawed thing. The genres are starting to trade places. History is offering possibilities, while fiction offers certainty…history is undercutting the authority of narrative while historical fiction still clings to it, asserting itself as more real than fact because it is a better story…The change in historical fiction has been the embrace of relativity, the idea that someone else is going to see a different part of the past, but history begins to suggest the possibility of complete subjectivity — that no one is seeing the past quite right and that the stories will not match up.
– Stevenson, 2003, Understanding Children’s Literature
A brief history of historical fiction for children
- Historical fiction began with Sir Walter Scott (1771-1832). He is most famous for Waverley, The Heart of Midlothian and Ivanhoe.
- Historical fiction for children has always needed to find favour with book buyers — parents, librarians and teachers.
- The work of Charlotte M. Yonge (1823-1901) is a great place to start for examples of ethics and accurate research and pious, morally upright behaviour. For example, The Little Duke (1854)
- Overt didacticism is no longer the aim of modern children’s historical fiction — rather, it’s meant to teach children about the past as well as entertain.
The advantages of historical fiction over non-fiction
- The reader is able to empathise with a particular character caught in that time and place.
- Fiction can portray what ordinary life was like, rather than focusing on the politics and battle fields. This allows for the inclusion of women in history, who were genuinely excluded from the history-book-making events, even though fully invested and involved in society.
- Young readers can learn that the difficulties of adolescence are universal, not just across cultures but across times.
The following are notes from a lecture by David Beagley, La Trobe University, available on iTunes U.
The past is a foreign land. They do things differently there.
Winters and Schmidt, Edging The Boundaries Of Children’s Literature. This is a good outline. (Especially Cullinan and Goulder’s chapter.)
In Australia: Jackie French, who started off writing humorous books but more recently deal with historical realities.
The three types of historical story
1. A bit of the scenery is historical.
2. Fictionalised history. The time period is the key thing. The plot is fictional.
3. Real events and people, with another story slipped into the cracks between.
Historical fiction can be more real than realistic fiction.
This is a biographical story because Sadako was a real person. So many elements of any story are determined by the setting chosen by the story. Authenticity is essential. If a story is set in the past, we have records. Other people can see how accurate the details are, from the clothing worn by the characters to the food they eat.
The concerns expressed in historical fiction will be different from those expressed in modern works. For example, environmental concern is a modern concern.
A book is often a child reader’s a first contact with a historical situation.
A problem encountered by authors can be lack of information about the era. This is an issue encountered by authors such as Jean M. Auel.
Blacklock’s Pankration was published at a time when drug cheating in the Olympics was starting to make headlines. We have no evidence that this was a problem in the early history of the Olympics, when this story is set.
The Ramose series by Carol Wilkinson looks at Egyptian Pharoahs with all the inter-family feuding is detailed in the tombs, so the author does have a responsibility to make sure it does not contradict the evidence that we do have.
Historical fiction must be balanced with the fact that history is real but fiction is not. Historical fiction must be ‘realistic’ if not ‘real’. The reader must believe the story could have occurred, not that it did.
When historical facts take centre stage, a difficulty for the writer is keeping the prose from reading like an encyclopedia. Another difficulty is that English language has changed a lot across the centuries — more than most people would guess — and so the writer must invent some sort of hybrid English which avoids obvious uses of modern language, while guesstimating which words are going to be acceptable as shared by an earlier era.
Australian Examples Of Historical Fiction
Tangara is an Australian historical novel set in Tasmania. A white farm girl encounters an Aboriginal girl.
Ruth Park’s Playing Beatie Bow is set in the slums Sydney in the late 1800s.
My Place is a picturebook by Nadia Wheatley, originally published in 1988 but since rewritten (2008). The reader is taken back to the same place in Sydney, in ten year jumps. (2008, 1998, 1988…1788).
There is now a TV series based on this book.
Our Australian Girl (like Our American Girl), My Story, etc. are series which depict fictional characters in real historical situations.
The Time-Slip Technique
A common technique employed by authors of historical fiction is the ‘time slip’. Hitler’s Daughter, Playing Beatie Bow and Tangara all make use of this technique. A character from the present world of the story has a bridge to an earlier time. This makes for a kind of (portal) fantasy story.
It’s important that the reader identifies with the main character, so that the reader is interested enough to learn about the historical parts. The aim is for the readers to feel as if the story is happening to them.
Historical fiction is relevant to young readers because history has contributed to our very existence, and has contributed to our culture.
Evaluating A Work Of Historical Fiction
Are events consistent with what we know of the historical era?
Gladiator is one of the worst films for historical inaccuracies. Even his name is inverted. The Romans never put personal names first. Caesar Julius, not the other way around. Women weren’t seen in the Colosseum. There were no outed left-handed people. Left-handed people were burned. There was no letter ‘u’ — they used ‘v’. Paper wasn’t invented so there wouldn’t have been leaflets. Horses had no saddles and no stirrups. There were no Rhode Island Red chickens. There was no welding. Some of the helmets were Anglo-Saxon. Certainly no wrist watches and jet trails across the sky, and no girls wearing jeans.
1. Of the characters who are meant to represent people from that era, are they realistic representations?
Some time in the future, what if people thought of Home and Away or My Kitchen Rules as a guide to how we all lived?
2. Is the reader able to visualise the setting?
If the characters don’t have glass in the windows, how does that affect their daily lives? How do people store their meat without refrigeration?
3. Is the narrator authentic?
Regardless of mode of narration (external/internal) the narrator is an imagined person in that historical situation, so must sound historically authentic. This is problematic because language changes a lot over time, so modern English speakers wouldn’t be able to understand Old English. So the narration must be an approximation. Do characters speak to people in authority the way they would have? Beagley uses the term ‘Gadzookery’ to describe language which is meant to sound old without being a natural replication. [I would add ‘pirate-speak’ to that. Pirates didn’t really speak the way we think they do.]
The TV adaptation of Miss Fisher’s Murder Mysteries is set in 1920s Australia, but all the characters in this series have very similar accents. This wasn’t the case in 1920s Australia, in which there was a significant distinction between how the upper classes and the working classes spoke. The upper classes sounded English. The working class sounded unabashedly so, with different word usage and a vastly different accent. This distinction wouldn’t sit well with an Australian audience, but can jar with people who know a bit about
Brother Cadfael Murder Mysteries are historically accurate, except for the way in which Brother Cadfael makes use of modern medicine.
Problems with balancing modern expectations of good stories against historical realities
For example, do we have a modern feminist character set in Roman times arguing for women’s rights? Beagley argues that this simply didn’t happen. [I argue that we can’t prove it didn’t, though feminist action obviously didn’t get them anywhere, so authenticity depends on the conclusion of the story.] A good example of characters acting out of accordance with their time period is the BBC production of Robin Hood. The role of women was very much out of kilter with the history of the time. In the TV series Maid Marion was a rival for Robin Hood.
[See Spunky Heroines: A YA Historical Fiction Dilemma for more on this topic.]
A list of books about ‘The Past’ from Reading Matters